Last week, Motown legend Stevie Wonder did something wonderful for anyone who has disabilities. Speaking at the UN World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) assembly in Geneva, he cajoled the delegates into a sing-along to some classics (such as “I Just Called to Say I Love You” and “My Cherie Amour”) to illustrate just how important access to arts and culture is, arguing that so many people with disabilities are unfairly restricted in their access.
In Wonder’s words: “It’s a call to action, a plan that will empower the independence of people with disabilities by providing them with the tools to learn and grow”. In an ideal world, every book or resource would be available in a diverse range of formats (including Braille and audio) to allow the maximum possible access to anyone. However, in reality, only about 5% of reading materials in the States are accessible in other forms (and only 1% in developing nations). One of the main reasons for this deplorable lapse in coverage is to do with domestic and international disputes over copyright issues; institutes for accessibility in different countries will often have to make identical duplicates of Braille or audio versions of texts because of legal copyright reasons.
The World Blind Union describes the situation as a ‘book famine’ and supported Wonder’s stirring call to action. Right now, he said, over 300 million people are adversely affected by the existing copyright laws.
Of course, the concept of accessibility comes in many different shapes and sizes. Intellectual accessibility runs the risk of being overlooked in the face of more obvious needs such as accessibility to transport, public spaces or employment. Whilst it is vital that people with disabilities are able to safely and comfortably access, for example, a shared kitchen or bathroom, creating opportunities for universal access to music, books and film is just as important. As Wonder states at the conference: “There are people who have probably even far more to offer than myself who are locked into this kind of prison because information is not available to them”.

